okx_predictions_redeem

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided. The description hints at a fund transfer but does not disclose behavioral traits such as permissions, reversibility, or effects beyond the transfer.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short, but it is under-specified rather than concise. It lacks critical information to be considered efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (a fund transfer in predictions) and lack of output schema, the description is insufficient. It fails to explain the redeem action or return value.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 100% coverage for the single parameter 'assetId', with a Chinese description '资产ID'. The description adds minimal value beyond the schema, earning the baseline score.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description mentions 'FUND_TRANSFER' and '预测' (predictions), but does not clearly state what the tool does. The purpose is vague, requiring inference from context.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It instructs to call 'agent_catalog' first, providing a prerequisite. However, it lacks guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like other prediction or transfer tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.