okx_get_easy_convert_currency_list

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description only hints at a read operation via '[L:READ]' but does not explain side effects, authentication needs, rate limits, or the consequence of not calling agent_catalog. With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden and falls short.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short (one sentence) and thus concise, but it uses cryptic tags that are not self-explanatory. It lacks clear structure for human or AI readability, earning a middling score.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema and no annotations, the description should explain what the tool returns and how it fits into the easy-convert workflow. It only instructs to call agent_catalog, leaving the agent without sufficient context about the tool's purpose and output.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has no parameters (0), and schema coverage is 100% trivially. The baseline score is 4 as per guidelines. The description does not add parameter-related meaning but does not detract either.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses cryptic tags ('[L:READ]', 'CAT:[交易]') and a vague instruction to call agent_catalog, but does not explicitly state that this tool retrieves a list of currencies available for easy conversion. It fails to differentiate from similar sibling tools like okx_get_convert_currencies.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The only guidance is to call agent_catalog first, which is a prerequisite but not a complete usage guideline. No information is provided about when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., okx_get_easy_convert_history, okx_get_convert_currencies) or when to avoid it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.