okx_get_option_trades

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description includes a label '[L:READ]' hinting at read-only behavior, but no annotations are provided. There is no disclosure of side effects, authentication needs, rate limits, or other behavioral traits. The transparency is minimal.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short, but it is overly terse and fails to convey essential information. It includes a prerequisite that may be useful but wastes the opportunity to describe the tool's purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description is severely incomplete. With no annotations, no output schema, and three parameters, the description should provide more context about the tool's return data, usage constraints, and behaviors. It only gives a prerequisite and a category.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, with descriptions for all three parameters. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description is vague and does not clearly state that the tool retrieves option trades from OKX. The name is self-explanatory, but the description only provides a prerequisite ('please call agent_catalog first') and a category label, which is insufficient for purpose clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus siblings. The only instruction is to call agent_catalog first, which is a prerequisite but not a usage guideline. Sibling tools include many other OKX public data tools, and there is no distinction.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.