okx_redeem_sol_staking

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description lacks any behavioral details. The '[L:READ]' tag is ambiguous and likely contradicts the redeeming action (which is a write operation). No permissions, effects, or return values are mentioned. With no annotations, this is insufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short (one line with tags and a reference), but this brevity comes at the cost of informativeness. It is under-specified rather than concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool that redeems staked SOL, the description gives no context about the redemption process, prerequisites, or outcome. It is incomplete and relies on another tool (agent_catalog) for any meaningful information.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There is only one parameter 'amt' with schema coverage 100%. The schema already provides a description (Chinese for redemption amount). The tool description does not add any extra meaning, so it meets the baseline but does not exceed it.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a label '[L:READ]' and a category tag, but does not directly state that the tool redeems SOL staking. The name implies the action, but the description is too vague to confirm the purpose. It refers to agent_catalog instead of defining its own function.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like okx_purchase_sol_staking or okx_get_sol_staking_balance. The instruction to call agent_catalog first is not a usage guideline but a dependency note.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.