okx_event_place_order

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description must disclose behavioral traits. It only signals a write level '[L:WRITE]' but omits side effects, authentication needs, error behavior, or what happens upon placement.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely short but lacks human-readable structure. The bracket notation is cryptic and not front-loaded with clear purpose. Every sentence should earn its place; this one-line description does not.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 6 parameters, no output schema, no annotations, and numerous sibling order tools, the description is severely incomplete. It fails to explain return values, required prerequisites (beyond agent_catalog), or how outcomes are specified.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers 100% of parameters with descriptions. The tool description adds no extra semantic context for parameters beyond the schema. Baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description is nearly tautological: 'place order' is already in the name. The cryptic format '[L:WRITE] CAT:[预测]' adds no clear verb or resource. Does not distinguish from sibling tools like okx_predictions_place_order.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Description gives a prerequisite ('请先调用 agent_catalog'), which is a minimal usage hint. No guidance on when to use this vs. alternative order tools or how to determine event markets.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.