okx_first_copy_settings

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only mentions category and prerequisite, with no info on idempotency, destructiveness, return value, or side effects. This is insufficient for a write operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise (one line) and includes a category tag and prerequisite. However, it sacrifices completeness for brevity. It is front-loaded with useful hints but lacks structure.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description is incomplete for a tool with 4 parameters, no output schema, and many siblings. It does not explain the return value, usage context, or effect. The prerequisite agent_catalog is mentioned but not explained. This is inadequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 100% coverage with parameter descriptions. The description adds no additional meaning to parameters. It does not elaborate on how parameters interact or any constraints beyond the schema. Baseline for high coverage is 3, but since description adds no value, score is reduced.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description labels the tool as WRITE and category '策略-跟单' but does not explicitly state what the tool does. The name 'first_copy_settings' implies initial setup, but the description lacks a clear verb and resource. It is vague.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description includes a prerequisite directive '请先调用 agent_catalog', which is a useful guideline. However, it fails to distinguish when to use this tool versus sibling tools like okx_set_copy_settings. No when-not-to-use or alternative guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.