Roblox Search User Interface

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only describes what is searched, not how the search behaves (e.g., pagination, result format, authentication requirements). For a read-like operation, this is insufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with concrete examples, front-loading the purpose. Every word earns its place; there is no fluff or repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple search tool with two parameters and no output schema, the description is largely complete. It specifies the search domain and gives examples. However, it lacks mention of the result format (e.g., item names, IDs), which would be useful for an agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Both parameters are fully documented in the schema (100% coverage). The description adds value by providing example keywords for the 'keyword' parameter, enhancing the agent's understanding beyond the schema. However, nothing additional is said about 'limit', so overall minor improvement.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'search', the resource 'UI/GUI templates, screens, health bars, inventory layouts, HUDs, or main menus', and the domain 'Roblox Creator Store'. It effectively distinguishes this tool from sibling search tools like roblox_search_asset3d or roblox_search_decal by specifying the UI/GUI focus.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides examples of when to use the tool (e.g., for health bar UI, custom chat GUI), implying usage context. However, it does not explicitly state when not to use it or mention alternatives from the extensive sibling list of search tools, leaving room for confusion.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.