Roblox Search Game System

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description bears the full burden of behavioral disclosure. While it correctly implies a read-only search operation, it does not mention any side effects, authorization needs, or what the results contain. Minimal transparency beyond the basic action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, well-structured sentence that front-loads the specific action. It includes targeted examples, contains no redundant words, and earns its place. Ideal conciseness for a focused search tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description adequately specifies what is searched (game systems) and provides examples, but it does not describe the output structure or pagination behavior. Since there is no output schema, a brief note on return format would improve completeness. Adequate for a simple search.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds value by providing concrete examples for the keyword parameter (e.g., 'inventory system', 'datastore save'), which clarifies expected inputs. The limit parameter is standard and not elaborated, but the examples improve usability.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states 'Search specifically for complete game systems, backend services, economy engines, or data stores', providing a specific verb and resource. This distinguishes it from sibling search tools like roblox_search_asset3d or roblox_search_decal, which target other asset types. Examples further clarify scope.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The word 'specifically' and the list of categories imply this tool is for game systems, contrasting with sibling tools. However, it does not explicitly state when not to use it or name alternatives, leaving some ambiguity. The context is clear but lacking explicit exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.