autotask_list_category_tools

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Being a listing tool, it is implicitly read-only, but with no annotations provided, the description does not explicitly state safety (e.g., no side effects) or any limitations like pagination. It relies on the verb 'list' to imply non-destructiveness, but could be more explicit.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, no wasted words. The first sentence states the core function, the second provides usage context. Information is front-loaded and efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the tool's purpose and usage context adequately for a simple utility. It mentions 'full schemas' in output, but doesn't detail the output structure. Given no output schema and no annotations, a bit more specificity on return format would improve it.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The single parameter 'category' is already well-described in the schema. The description adds concrete examples ('tickets', 'financial', 'companies') beyond the schema, helping the agent select a valid value. This adds value given 100% schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states 'List tools in a specific category with full schemas', which is specific and distinguishes it from sibling tools that operate on individual entities. References autotask_list_categories as a prerequisite, establishing its unique role.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Directly instructs to 'Use after autotask_list_categories', providing a clear workflow and prerequisite. This guides the agent on when and in what sequence to use the tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.