autotask_create_task

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits but only states 'Create'. It fails to mention required permissions, side effects, or confirmation behavior. The agent learns nothing about write implications beyond the schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, minimal sentence with no waste. It is front-loaded and efficient. Could include a bit more context without sacrificing conciseness, but currently earns a 4.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 9 parameters (3 required) and no output schema, the description should mention return values (e.g., created task ID). It also lacks constraints or prerequisites. Completeness is inadequate for a creation tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all parameters. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the verb 'Create'. According to rules, baseline 3 is appropriate when schema is complete.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Create a new task in Autotask' uses a specific verb ('Create') and resource ('task'), clearly distinguishing from sibling tools like autotask_search_tasks (search) and autotask_update_task (update). It leaves no ambiguity about the tool's action.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., autotask_search_tasks for finding existing tasks, autotask_update_task for modifications). There is no mention of preconditions, excluded scenarios, or comparative context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.