unity_hub_get_install_path
Retrieve the default installation path for Unity Editors managed by Unity Hub.
Instructions
Get the current default installation path for Unity Editors.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve the default installation path for Unity Editors managed by Unity Hub.
Get the current default installation path for Unity Editors.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It states it gets the path, implying a read operation. No disclosure of side effects, errors, or return format. For a simple read-only tool with no params, this is adequate but minimal.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, concise, front-loaded with key action and resource. No wasted words. Could be slightly improved by mentioning return type, but still efficient.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool is simple (0 params, no output schema). Description covers core purpose. Missing info on return format or error conditions. With no annotations and no output schema, description is adequate but not complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters in schema, so description adds no param info beyond schema. Schema description coverage is 100% (no params). Baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool retrieves the default installation path for Unity Editors. The verb 'Get' and resource 'default installation path' are specific. It distinguishes from siblings like unity_hub_set_install_path (set) and unity_hub_list_editors (list).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance. The purpose implies it's for checking the current path before installing or modifying. Sibling tools provide context but the description doesn't directly mention alternatives.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/AnkleBreaker-Studio/unity-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server