listWebhooks
Retrieve all configured webhooks to view their settings and status.
Instructions
List all webhooks
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve all configured webhooks to view their settings and status.
List all webhooks
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; description only says 'List all webhooks', omitting any behavioral details like pagination, filtering, ordering, or side effects. Falls short of disclosing traits beyond the minimal.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no wasted words. Efficiently communicates the core function, though could expand without losing conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema or annotations, the description fails to provide any context about return format, pagination, ordering, or other relevant details for a listing tool. Incomplete for effective use.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Input schema has zero parameters with 100% coverage; description adds no parameter information. Baseline 3 applies per rule for high schema coverage.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description 'List all webhooks' clearly states verb 'list' and resource 'webhooks', and is distinct from sibling tools like getWebhook (single) and createWebhook.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., getWebhook for a single webhook, deleteWebhook, etc.). Implied usage but no explicit context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/mindwear-capitian/followupboss-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server