getPond
Retrieve a specific pond by its ID. Access pond details from Follow Up Boss CRM.
Instructions
Get a pond by ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Pond ID |
Retrieve a specific pond by its ID. Access pond details from Follow Up Boss CRM.
Get a pond by ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Pond ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations or behavioral details. Doesn't mention error handling, permissions, or response structure. Leaves agent guessing about outcomes.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise at 5 words, no redundancy. Front-loaded with essential information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Minimally complete for a simple retrieval tool, but lacks output schema and any description of what the pond object contains. Could be more informative.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema covers 'id' fully with description 'Pond ID'. Description adds no extra meaning beyond schema. Baseline score of 3 applies due to high schema coverage.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the action 'Get' and resource 'pond' with key parameter 'by ID'. It distinguishes from sibling 'listPonds' which retrieves all ponds.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like 'listPonds' or search. No context on prerequisites or when not to use.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/mindwear-capitian/followupboss-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server