getSmartList
Retrieve a specific smart list by its ID to access predefined contacts or leads in Follow Up Boss.
Instructions
Get a smart list by ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Smart list ID |
Retrieve a specific smart list by its ID to access predefined contacts or leads in Follow Up Boss.
Get a smart list by ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Smart list ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description lacks details about what the returned smart list contains, potential side effects, or required permissions. The minimal description fails to compensate for the absence of annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single concise sentence conveys the core purpose without superfluous information. However, it could be slightly expanded to include context without losing efficiency.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a retrieval tool with no output schema and single parameter, the description is insufficient. It does not explain the structure of a smart list or any return value details, leaving the agent underinformed.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with a clear parameter description ('Smart list ID'), but the description merely repeats this. It adds no additional semantic nuance beyond the schema, earning a baseline score of 3.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Get' and the resource 'smart list' with the method 'by ID'. It effectively communicates the basic retrieval action, distinguishing it from sibling tools like listSmartLists which returns multiple items.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage when a specific smart list ID is known, but provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., listSmartLists), nor any contextual prerequisites.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/mindwear-capitian/followupboss-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server