getDeal
Retrieve a specific deal from Follow Up Boss CRM by providing its unique ID. Access deal details instantly.
Instructions
Get a deal by ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Deal ID |
Retrieve a specific deal from Follow Up Boss CRM by providing its unique ID. Access deal details instantly.
Get a deal by ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Deal ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries full burden. It only states the action without disclosing behavioral traits like idempotency, side-effects (none expected), or response structure. No mention of read-only nature beyond the verb.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence of 5 words, no waste. Essential information is front-loaded and efficiently presented.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity (one param, no output schema), the description is minimally adequate. It could benefit from mentioning return type or error conditions, but overall acceptable.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with the single parameter 'id' described as 'Deal ID'. Description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema, earning a baseline score of 3.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states 'Get a deal by ID', specifying the verb, resource, and identifier. This distinguishes it from siblings like listDeals (returns multiple) and createDeal (writes).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like listDeals or custom searches. The description implies usage when a specific ID is known, but fails to mention limitations or prerequisites.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/mindwear-capitian/followupboss-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server