deleteWebhook
Remove a webhook subscription by its ID to stop receiving event notifications from Follow Up Boss.
Instructions
Delete a webhook
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Webhook ID |
Remove a webhook subscription by its ID to stop receiving event notifications from Follow Up Boss.
Delete a webhook
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Webhook ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Without annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only states 'delete', implying destructive action, but provides no details on consequences, permissions, or irreversibility. Minimal transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence, front-loaded, with no extraneous words. However, it is overly brief and could convey additional useful information without losing conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simple operation and lack of output schema, the description is minimally adequate but incomplete. It does not mention typical side effects or prerequisites, leaving gaps for an AI agent.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%: the single parameter 'id' is described as 'Webhook ID'. The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, so the score is at baseline.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Delete a webhook' clearly states the verb and resource, matching the tool name. It is unambiguous, but does not explicitly distinguish it from other delete tools, though the schema's parameter 'id' confirms the resource type.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., listWebhooks first, or other delete operations). The description lacks context for appropriate usage.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/mindwear-capitian/followupboss-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server