followupboss-mcp-server
Related Servers
Alternatives to followupboss-mcp-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives AI agents full access to Follow Up Boss CRM via natural language, enabling CRUD operations on people, deals, appointments, and more through 160 tools.10033 npm1Elastic 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA self-hosted MCP server that connects a Follow Up Boss CRM account to Claude, enabling CRM operations through natural language via 25 curated tools and a raw API tool.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server for GoHighLevel with 82 live-tested tools, enabling CRM operations like contact management, appointments, invoices, and workflows via natural language.65 npmMIT
- AlicenseCqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to work with the Follow Up Boss real estate CRM API through 130+ tools for operations like people, notes, deals, and smart lists, while keeping the user's API key local and delete operations opt-in.133224 npm1MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for GoHighLevel API v2 that provides 50+ tools for CRM, billing, marketing, and operations workflows, enabling natural language interaction with contacts, opportunities, conversations, and more.501MIT
- AlicenseCqualityAmaintenanceA comprehensive MCP server covering the full GoHighLevel API surface with 651 tools, enabling management of contacts, opportunities, calendars, invoices, and more through natural language, with multi-tenant support and read-only safety defaults.50065 npm1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 136 tools
The vast surface is still largely partitioned by resource+action, and descriptions actively steer between near-neighbors (getPersonByEmail vs listPeople, searchPeopleByTag vs listPeople, removeTagFromPerson vs updatePerson, bulkUpdatePeople vs updatePerson, templates vs text message templates vs email campaigns). A few genuine overlaps remain — checkDuplicate vs getPersonByEmail, listCustomFields vs listDealCustomFields vs listStages, and getReactions/getThreadedReplies that only fetch by ID while listing lives elsewhere — but on the whole an agent can pick correctly.
The dominant pattern is verb_noun camelCase (listPeople, createDeal, updateAppointment, getWebhook), applied across nearly all 136 tools. Deviations are minor: namespace-prefixed tools (inboxAppAddMessage, inboxAppInstall, listInboxAppInstallations), plural names for single-item getters (getReactions, getThreadedReplies), the Em abbreviation (listEmEvents, createEmCampaign), and non-verb utility tools (about, help).
136 tools is far past the point where a single agent can hold the surface in mind, even though the underlying Follow Up Boss CRM is genuinely sprawling (people, deals, pipelines, appointments, automations, inbox apps, teams, ponds, webhooks). Many resources contribute 4-5 near-identical CRUD variants, so the count is defensible in principle but overwhelming in practice; splitting or namespace-scoping would help considerably.
Coverage is unusually broad: CRUD across people, deals, tasks, appointments, notes, calls, pipelines, stages, groups, teams, ponds, webhooks, automations, action plans, custom fields, plus specialized lookups. Gaps are mostly deletions (no delete tools for any resource), missing list operations for attachments and reactions/threaded replies (only get-by-ID), and no update paths for people's source/sourceUrl, but these are largely upstream API limitations rather than oversights.