followupboss-mcp-server
Related Servers
Alternatives to followupboss-mcp-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives AI agents full access to Follow Up Boss CRM via natural language, enabling CRUD operations on people, deals, appointments, and more through 160 tools.10033 npm1Elastic 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA self-hosted MCP server that connects a Follow Up Boss CRM account to Claude, enabling CRM operations through natural language via 25 curated tools and a raw API tool.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server for GoHighLevel with 82 live-tested tools, enabling CRM operations like contact management, appointments, invoices, and workflows via natural language.116 npmMIT
- AlicenseCqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to work with the Follow Up Boss real estate CRM API through 130+ tools for operations like people, notes, deals, and smart lists, while keeping the user's API key local and delete operations opt-in.13338 npm1MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for GoHighLevel API v2 that provides 50+ tools for CRM, billing, marketing, and operations workflows, enabling natural language interaction with contacts, opportunities, conversations, and more.501MIT
- AlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceA comprehensive MCP server covering the full GoHighLevel API surface with 651 tools, enabling management of contacts, opportunities, calendars, invoices, and more through natural language, with multi-tenant support and read-only safety defaults.100116 npm1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 136 tools
Most tools are clearly tied to a specific resource and action, but there are several overlapping boundaries: getPersonByEmail vs checkDuplicate, searchPeopleByTag vs listPeople with tags, and listEvents vs listEmEvents vs createEvent vs createEmEvent. The descriptions help disambiguate, but the set is large enough that misselection is a real risk.
The server mostly follows a consistent camelCase verbNoun pattern: listX, createX, getX, updateX. Minor inconsistencies include listAutomationsPeople, about/help, and the abbreviated Em prefix, but these are understandable and do not seriously undermine predictability.
At 136 tools, this is far beyond a well-scoped MCP surface. Even for a broad CRM API, the sheer volume creates a heavy selection burden for agents and dilutes the value of individual tools. A smaller, more curated set would be far more usable.
The server covers an impressively wide range of CRM entities: people, deals, appointments, tasks, pipelines, webhooks, templates, teams, and more. However, most entities lack delete/remove lifecycle operations, and some workflows are one-directional, such as logging text messages without sending them. The surface is broad but has notable lifecycle gaps.