deletePerson
Delete a person from Follow Up Boss CRM by ID. The record is moved to trash and removed from active lists.
Instructions
Delete (trash) a person by ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Person ID to delete |
Delete a person from Follow Up Boss CRM by ID. The record is moved to trash and removed from active lists.
Delete (trash) a person by ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Person ID to delete |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description says 'trash' implying a soft delete, but does not clarify side effects, permissions needed, or reversibility. No annotations to compensate.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no fluff, front-loads the action and resource. Could be slightly more informative without being verbose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Adequate for a simple single-parameter tool, but missing behavioral context like whether the deletion is soft or hard, and any cascading effects.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so the description adds no new meaning beyond the schema. Baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (Delete/trash) and the resource (a person by ID), making it distinct from sibling tools like deleteNote or deleteDeal.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no prerequisites or exclusion criteria mentioned.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/mindwear-capitian/followupboss-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server