blueprint_remove_event_dispatcher

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses the side-effect that the tool will compile and save after removal, which is valuable information. Since there are no annotations, this description carries the full burden and does well by mentioning the post-removal actions, though it does not cover error cases or prerequisites.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence that clearly states the primary action and the important side-effect. It contains zero wasted words and is appropriately concise for a simple tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the low complexity (two well-documented parameters, no output schema), the description is essentially complete. It states the operation and subsequent actions, and the schema fills in parameter details. A minor gap is not addressing the 'dispatcher not found' case, but this is not critical for a tool of this simplicity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Both parameters are fully described in the input schema, and the description only reinforces the 'name' parameter by saying 'by name'. It does not add additional semantic detail beyond the schema, which is acceptable given the high schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool removes an event dispatcher by name, which is a specific action on a specific resource. The verb 'remove' and the target 'event dispatcher' distinguish it from sibling tools like blueprint_remove_variable or blueprint_remove_function.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage (when you need to remove an event dispatcher from a Blueprint) but does not explicitly compare with alternatives or state when not to use it. There is no mentioning of exclusions or related tools, leaving room for inference.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.