qbo_transfers_list

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the burden. 'List' suggests a read-only operation, but the description does not explicitly state side effects, authentication needs, or rate limits. However, for a simple list operation, minimal disclosure is acceptable.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence of 12 words, front-loaded with the main action and resource. Every word is meaningful and no information is redundant.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple list tool with pagination and date filters, the description covers the essentials. The schema fully documents parameters. The lack of output schema is noted, but the tool name and sibling tools imply the return structure. Minor omission of default pagination values is acceptable.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds context by mentioning 'optional TxnDate range,' which explains the dual purpose of startDate and endDate, enhancing understanding beyond the schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('List'), the resource ('Transfer records'), and the context ('QuickBooks Online'). It also mentions pagination and optional TxnDate range, which distinguishes it from related transfer tools (create, get, update) and other list tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies this tool is for listing multiple transfers with pagination and date filtering. It does not explicitly mention when not to use it or compare to alternatives, but the context is clear enough for an agent to infer appropriate usage among siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.