qbo_terms_get
Retrieve a QuickBooks Online term record by its unique ID to access payment terms details for invoices.
Instructions
Get a specific Term record by its ID.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| termId | Yes | The unique Term ID |
Retrieve a QuickBooks Online term record by its unique ID to access payment terms details for invoices.
Get a specific Term record by its ID.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| termId | Yes | The unique Term ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits (e.g., read-only, no side effects, authorization needs). It only states the retrieval action, which is minimal for transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence that efficiently communicates the tool's purpose without any wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simple one-parameter tool with no output schema, the description adequately explains the input but omits what the response contains (e.g., full Term record). This leaves a gap for the agent.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% for the single parameter (termId with description 'The unique Term ID'). The description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema already provides.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb (Get) and identifies the resource (Term record) and retrieval method (by its ID), clearly distinguishing from siblings like qbo_terms_list (list all) and qbo_terms_search (search).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage when you have a Term ID, but does not explicitly state when to use this tool over siblings like list or search, nor provides exclusions or alternatives.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/wyre-technology/qbo-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server