Skip to main content
Glama
wyre-technology

QuickBooks Online MCP Server

qbo_time_activities_create

Record employee or vendor time entries in QuickBooks Online with date, duration, and billing details.

Instructions

Create a new TimeActivity record in QuickBooks Online.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
HoursNoDuration hours portion
NameOfYesWhose time this is: "Employee" or "Vendor"
EndTimeNoEnd time (ISO 8601), alternative to Hours+Minutes
ItemRefNoService item the time is logged against, e.g. {"value": "7"}
MinutesNoDuration minutes portion
TaxableNoWhether the time is taxable when billed
TxnDateYesActivity date (YYYY-MM-DD)
StartTimeNoStart time (ISO 8601), alternative to Hours+Minutes
VendorRefNoVendor reference when NameOf is "Vendor", e.g. {"value": "56"}
HourlyRateNoHourly billing rate
CustomerRefNoCustomer the time is billed to (optional)
DescriptionNoActivity description
EmployeeRefNoEmployee reference when NameOf is "Employee", e.g. {"value": "42"}
BillableStatusNoBillable status: "Billable", "NotBillable", or "HasBeenBilled"
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, and the description only states it creates a record. No disclosure of side effects, validation, permissions, or what happens on success/failure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, no fluff. Could be more informative, but appropriately concise for a simple create action.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 14 parameters, conditional logic (NameOf determines EmployeeRef vs VendorRef), and no output schema, the description is too minimal. It does not explain validation or conditional requirements.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents parameters. The description adds no extra parameter information. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states 'Create a new TimeActivity record', which is a specific verb-resource pair. It distinguishes from sibling tools like qbo_time_activities_get, qbo_time_activities_list, and qbo_time_activities_update.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., when to use update instead). No prerequisites or context for usage are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/wyre-technology/qbo-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server