Skip to main content
Glama
advenimus

SyncroMSP MCP Server

rmm_create_alert

Create an RMM alert for a specific customer and asset. Set the alert type, details, status, and include trigger properties to match real alert structure.

Instructions

Create an RMM alert. Note: formatted_output (not in swagger) populates the 'Details' field in the UI. description maps to the 'Type' field. Include properties with trigger and description keys to match real alert structure.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
customer_idNoCustomer ID
asset_idNoAsset ID
descriptionNoAlert description (maps to 'Type' field in UI)
formatted_outputNoPopulates the 'Details' field in UI (not in swagger docs)
resolvedNoWhether resolved
statusNoStatus
propertiesNoAdditional properties -- include trigger and description to match real alert structure
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist so description carries burden; it discloses field mappings but does not cover idempotency, auth, or side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences, front-loaded with purpose, no redundant information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 7 params, nested objects, and no output schema, the description clarifies key mappings and real-structure hints, though returns are not mentioned.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, baseline 3. Description adds value by explaining UI mapping and hints for properties structure, exceeding mere schema repetition.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool creates an RMM alert, but does not differentiate from sibling tools like rmm_mute_alert or rmm_delete_alert.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides field mapping context (formatted_output, description, properties) but lacks explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus sibling alert tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/advenimus/syncromsp-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server