SyncroMSP MCP Server

time_update_timelog

Update a time log entry by modifying clock-in/out times, lunch break, and notes. Adjust timelog details directly.

Instructions

Update a time log entry (clock in/out, lunch, notes)

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "time_update_timelog"
  }
}

Input Schema

Name	Required	Description
`in_at`	No	Clock-in time (ISO 8601)
`lunch`	No	Lunch break
`out_at`	No	Clock-out time (ISO 8601)
`in_note`	No	Clock-in note
`out_note`	No	Clock-out note

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

First observedv0.1.1May 26, 2026

TDQS

C2.4/5.0

Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Without annotations, the description does not disclose side effects, permission requirements, or how partial updates affect other fields. It simply lists fields to update without behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single short sentence, which is concise but lacks critical information about how the tool functions, making it minimally viable.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With five optional parameters and no required ones, the tool appears to update a timelog without specifying which one. The description does not explain this or mention what the return value is. The absence of an output schema is not compensated.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Although schema coverage is 100%, the description adds no meaning beyond the schema and does not clarify the missing identifier parameter. The description essentially repeats the schema fields.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose3/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Update a time log entry' and lists fields (clock in/out, lunch, notes), but fails to specify how the target timelog is identified, as the input schema has no required parameters for identification.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus sibling tools like time_update_timer or time_list_timelogs. The description does not clarify the context for usage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server