appointments_update_type

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only says 'Update', implying mutation, but does not mention side effects (e.g., impact on existing appointments), required permissions, or idempotency. The lack of transparency is significant for a mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, which is concise but overly brief for a 5-parameter tool. It could include more detail without becoming verbose, achieving a balance between brevity and informativeness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 5 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is incomplete. It does not explain return values, validation rules, or error conditions. The tool's complexity demands richer context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Only the 'id' parameter has a schema description; other 4 parameters have none. The tool description adds no meaning to any parameter, failing to explain what 'name', 'email_instructions', 'location_type', or 'location_hard_code' represent or their allowed values.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Update' and the resource 'appointment type', distinguishing it from related tools like 'appointments_create_type' and 'appointments_delete_type'. However, it does not specify which fields can be updated.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There are no instructions on prerequisites, exclusions, or context for invocation. The sibling tools suggest a CRUD pattern, but no explicit usage advice is given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.