admin_list_portal_users
List all customer portal users to manage access and permissions in SyncroMSP.
Instructions
List customer portal users
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
List all customer portal users to manage access and permissions in SyncroMSP.
List customer portal users
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits (e.g., read-only, pagination, permissions). With the full burden on the description, it fails to convey any behavior beyond the action.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence, which is concise but adds minimal value beyond the tool name. It is efficient yet under-specified.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity (no parameters, no output schema), the description is minimal. It does not indicate what the output contains or any limitations, leaving the agent guessing.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters, so the description does not need to add parameter details. Schema coverage is 100% trivially, and baseline is 4.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'List customer portal users' clearly states the verb and resource, making the basic purpose unambiguous. However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like 'admin_list_users', which might have a similar but broader scope.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'admin_list_users' or 'admin_create_portal_user'. The description offers no contextual hints for tool selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/advenimus/syncromsp-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server