products_get
Retrieve detailed information for a specific product using its unique ID.
Instructions
Get a product by ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Product ID |
Retrieve detailed information for a specific product using its unique ID.
Get a product by ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Product ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It implies a read-only operation but does not disclose authentication needs, error behaviors (e.g., missing ID), or any side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence with no fluff. It could benefit from slight expansion (e.g., mentioning the return value) but remains efficient for a simple tool.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity (one parameter, no output schema, no nested objects), the description is mostly adequate but leaves gaps about the returned product data and error handling.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, and the schema already describes the 'id' parameter as 'Product ID'. The description adds no additional context beyond this, meeting the baseline of 3.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Get a product by ID' clearly states the verb (Get) and resource (product by ID), distinguishing it from siblings like products_list (list all) and products_create (create).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as products_list or products_get_serial. The description does not mention when not to use it or any prerequisites.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/advenimus/syncromsp-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server