admin_get_purchase_order
Retrieve a purchase order by its ID to access its details and manage procurement.
Instructions
Get a purchase order by ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | PO ID |
Retrieve a purchase order by its ID to access its details and manage procurement.
Get a purchase order by ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | PO ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description lacks behavioral details beyond the basic retrieve action. No annotations exist to compensate, so the agent is unaware of permissions, data scope (e.g., active vs. all), or if the operation is read-only.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, efficient sentence with no extraneous words, conveying the essential purpose clearly.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Without an output schema, the description should indicate what is returned (e.g., full purchase order object). It does not, leaving the agent uninformed about the response structure.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The parameter is fully described in the schema ('PO ID'), and the description merely restates it without adding further meaning. Baseline 3 applies due to high schema coverage.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool retrieves a purchase order by ID, using a specific verb and resource, distinguishing it from sibling tools that create, list, or modify purchase orders.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as first using admin_list_purchase_orders to obtain the ID, or when not to use it.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/advenimus/syncromsp-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server