admin_create_worksheet

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It only states the action and a constraint, lacking details on side effects, permissions, or return behavior. It also contradicts the input schema by claiming worksheet_template_id is required when it is not listed in the required array.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with two sentences, no unnecessary words, and the critical note is front-loaded. Every sentence serves a purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description does not explain what a worksheet result is, what the tool returns upon success, or provide any additional context about the creation process. Given no output schema, more detail is needed for complete understanding.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already covers all parameters with descriptions. The description adds a note emphasizing that worksheet_template_id must reference an existing template, but contradicts the schema by stating it is required when it is not in the required list, reducing clarity.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Create' and the resource 'worksheet result for a ticket', making the tool's purpose specific and distinct from sibling tools like admin_update_worksheet or admin_delete_worksheet.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description notes that worksheet_template_id is required and must reference an existing template, which gives a constraint but does not provide guidance on when to use this tool vs others like admin_create_canned_response or admin_update_worksheet.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.