assets_get
Retrieve detailed information about a specific asset using its unique ID to quickly access full asset records.
Instructions
Get a single asset by ID with full details
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Asset ID |
Retrieve detailed information about a specific asset using its unique ID to quickly access full asset records.
Get a single asset by ID with full details
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Asset ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. Description indicates a read-only operation but does not disclose error handling, authentication requirements, or response format. Adequate for a straightforward get tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no redundant information. Efficiently communicates the tool's purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple get tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description is almost complete. It lacks detail on the return value, but 'full details' sufficiently hints at the output.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema covers 100% of parameter with description 'Asset ID'. Description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema provides. Baseline of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states verb 'Get', resource 'asset', scope 'single by ID', and specifies 'full details'. Distinct from sibling tools like assets_list which retrieves multiple assets.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use vs alternatives like assets_list or other get tools. However, the name and description are self-explanatory for a simple retrieval operation.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/advenimus/syncromsp-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server