leads_list
Retrieve a list of leads or opportunities from SyncroMSP. Specify the page number to paginate results.
Instructions
List leads/opportunities
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| page | No | Page number |
Retrieve a list of leads or opportunities from SyncroMSP. Specify the page number to paginate results.
List leads/opportunities
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| page | No | Page number |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so the description bears full responsibility. It only states 'List leads/opportunities' without mentioning pagination, sorting, or any behavioral traits.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no fluff. Could arguably be too terse, but it is concise and front-loaded with the core action.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simplicity (1 param, no output schema), the description is incomplete. It doesn't explain if it returns all leads, supports filtering, or pagination behavior.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% (one parameter 'page' described). The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, so a baseline of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool lists leads/opportunities, which is specific and distinguishes it from leads_create, leads_get, etc. However, it could be more precise (e.g., 'all leads' vs 'filtered').
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives (e.g., leads_get for a single lead). The description lacks context on filtering or pagination.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/advenimus/syncromsp-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server