admin_list_purchase_orders
Retrieve a paginated list of purchase orders from SyncroMSP to review and manage procurement records.
Instructions
List purchase orders
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| page | No | Page number |
Retrieve a paginated list of purchase orders from SyncroMSP to review and manage procurement records.
List purchase orders
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| page | No | Page number |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description only states it lists purchase orders. It does not disclose any behavioral traits such as pagination details, sorting, or response contents, leaving the agent to infer from the schema alone.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise at three words, with no wasted information. However, it could be slightly more informative without becoming verbose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simplicity of the tool (one optional param, no output schema), the description is too minimal. It fails to explain the context of purchase orders, response format, or any pagination behavior, which an agent might need.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% (only one parameter, 'page', with description). The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, so baseline score applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it lists purchase orders using a specific verb+resource. It is distinguishable from other admin_list_* tools by the resource type, but does not highlight any unique characteristics.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like admin_get_purchase_order or admin_receive_purchase_order, or other list tools. The description lacks context for selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/advenimus/syncromsp-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server