sophos_remove_endpoints_from_group

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description explicitly states that endpoints are not deleted, which is a positive disclosure. However, with no annotations provided, it does not mention other behavioral traits like authorization requirements, rate limits, or reversibility. It covers the key behavior but lacks depth.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences. The main action is front-loaded, and the clarifying sentence adds value without redundancy. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the essential purpose and key behavioral nuance (no deletion). However, given the lack of annotations and output schema, it could provide more context such as prerequisites, return behavior, or error conditions. It is minimally adequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with clear descriptions for all three parameters. The description adds that endpoints are only removed from the group, not deleted, but does not provide further semantics beyond what the schema offers. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (remove) and the resource (endpoints from an endpoint group). It also clarifies that endpoints are not deleted, distinguishing it from deletion tools like sophos_delete_endpoint.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., sophos_add_endpoints_to_group, sophos_delete_endpoint). It does not mention prerequisites or context, such as needing the group to exist or the endpoints to be members.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.