sophos_create_tenant_admin

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses that an invitation email is sent, adding value beyond annotations (readOnly=false, destr=false). No discussion of constraints or side effects beyond the email; could mention if email uniqueness is enforced.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences, front-loaded with purpose, no extraneous information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Provides enough context for a create tool: what it does (creates admin), how (via partner endpoint), side effect (email). Lacks response format detail and prerequisites, but with annotations (openWorldHint true) this is acceptable.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, and description does not add meaning beyond what the parameter descriptions already provide. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clear verb ('Create'), specific resource ('administrator for a managed tenant'), and context ('partner-level endpoint'). Distinguishes from siblings like sophos_invite_tenant_admin or sophos_create_partner_role.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implies use for creating managed tenant admins via partner endpoint, but no explicit when-to-use or alternatives provided. The mention of 'partner-level endpoint' hints at auth context, but no exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.