sophos_list_users_in_group

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so the description carries full burden. It only states the basic function without disclosing pagination behavior, authorization requirements, or error scenarios (e.g., invalid group_id). The schema implies pagination via page_key and page_size, but these are not mentioned.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, no fluff. However, it could be slightly expanded without harming conciseness (e.g., mention pagination). Still efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has pagination parameters but the description does not explain pagination or how to obtain the group_id. No output schema exists, so expectations about the response format are missing. For a simple read tool, it lacks completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% so the schema already documents all parameters. The description adds no additional meaning beyond explaining that it lists users belonging to a specific group. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'List', the resource 'users', and the scope 'members of a specific directory user group'. It effectively distinguishes from sibling tools like sophos_list_users (lists all users) and sophos_list_user_groups (lists groups).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when or when not to use this tool vs alternatives. For example, it doesn't mention that to list all users one should use sophos_list_users. The description lacks explicit usage context or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.