sophos_update_firewall_group

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Description is consistent with annotations (readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=false). It discloses mutation behavior and specific actions, but adds no extra context beyond annotations regarding auth needs, rate limits, or consequences.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One sentence, front-loaded, clear, and concise with zero wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple update tool with 5 parameters and no output schema, the description captures the main purpose adequately. Could mention the effect on the group or response, but not critical given schema coverage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has 100% coverage for all 5 parameters, so baseline is 3. Description briefly maps to parameters but does not add new meaning beyond what schema descriptions already provide.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb (update), resource (firewall group), and specific actions (rename, add/remove firewalls). It distinguishes from sibling tools like sophos_create_firewall_group and sophos_get_firewall_group.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no prerequisites, no exclusions. Implicit use case is modifying an existing group, but no clear direction.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.