sophos_create_ips_exclusion

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate non-read-only and non-destructive behavior. Description adds context that the tool exempts traffic from scanning and includes constraints on direction and remote addresses format. However, it does not disclose permissions required, side effects, or response behavior, which are not covered by annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is two sentences: first states the primary purpose, second provides key formatting details. It is front-loaded and efficient, with no wasted words. Slightly more structure could improve readability, but it is already quite concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has 6 parameters and no output schema. Description explains the main function and key parameter formats but omits return value, prerequisites (e.g., tenant existence), and success/failure indications. Given the tool's complexity (creation with multiple optional fields), the description is adequate but not fully complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. Description adds meaning for 'direction' (enum values) and 'remote_addresses' (format as comma-separated IPs/URLs) beyond the schema descriptions. Other parameters are not mentioned, but schema already describes them adequately.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the verb 'Create' and resource 'IPS exclusion', and explains the purpose: to exempt specific traffic from intrusion prevention scanning. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like list, get, update, and generic exclusion creation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Description specifies that direction must be 'inbound' or 'outbound' and that remote addresses are comma-separated, providing clear usage context. However, it does not explicitly state when to use this tool vs. alternatives like sophos_create_exclusion or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.