sophos_create_exclusion

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate non-read-only and non-destructive behavior. The description adds 'global' scope and explains parameter purpose but does not disclose additional behavioral traits such as required permissions, potential duplicates, or side effects beyond creation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences with no redundancy. The first sentence states the action, the second explains key parameters. However, it could be improved by front-loading the most critical information (e.g., required parameters) or using bullet points.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a creation tool with 5 parameters and no output schema, the description does not cover return values, error conditions, or confirmation of creation. It mentions only two parameters, leaving the agent to infer the role of 'type', 'scan_mode', and 'tenant_id' from the schema. Adequate but not comprehensive.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds modest value by explaining that 'value' is an exclusion path/process/URL and 'comment' documents the reason, but does not enhance understanding of 'type', 'scan_mode', or 'tenant_id' beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb ('Create') and resource ('global scanning exclusion'), and clearly distinguishes from siblings like 'sophos_list_exclusions' and 'sophos_update_exclusion' by focusing on creation. It also clarifies key parameters ('value', 'comment').

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'sophos_update_exclusion' or 'sophos_create_web_control_local_site'. The agent is not told when creation is appropriate versus modification.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.