sophos_dns_create_location

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description is the sole source of behavioral disclosure. It indicates a mutation ('Create') and adds a specific constraint (max 100 combined). However, it omits details like idempotency, required permissions, error behavior, or response format. The phrase 'Provide either' is slightly ambiguous regarding whether both IPs and domains can be provided together.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that front-loads the purpose. Every word is useful; no extraneous content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 10 parameters and no output schema, the description covers the core action and one key constraint, but it does not address the interplay between parameters (e.g., can both IPs and domains be provided? The term 'either' may cause confusion). It also omits details about parameter 'type' enum, which could affect usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds value by mentioning the combined max limit for IP addresses and domain names, but otherwise does not elaborate beyond the schema's parameter descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Create') and the resource ('a new DNS Protection location'). It also specifies the key input constraint (IP addresses or domain names, max 100 combined). Among sibling tools, it is distinct from other 'create' tools like sophos_dns_create_custom_domain and sophos_dns_create_policy.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides explicit guidance on what to provide ('either IP addresses or domain names') and a constraint ('combined total max 100'). However, it does not elaborate on when to use this tool versus related ones (e.g., sophos_dns_create_policy) or mention prerequisites or alternative scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.