sophos_get_mobile_device_group

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description states 'Get details', which implies a read operation, but provides no additional behavioral context such as required permissions, side effects, or rate limits. With no annotations, the description fails to disclose anything beyond the obvious.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single, concise sentence that is front-loaded with the key purpose. No unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description is adequate for a simple tool with clear schema, but lacks information about what 'details' are returned, any prerequisites, or the output format. Given no output schema, the description should provide more context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with both parameters described. The description adds 'by its ID' but does not provide additional meaning beyond what the schema already offers. Baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Get details'), identifies the resource ('mobile device group'), and specifies the retrieval method ('by its ID'). It clearly distinguishes this tool from siblings like sophos_list_mobile_device_groups, which lists all groups.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. For instance, there is no mention that sophos_list_mobile_device_groups should be used to list groups first before calling this tool to get details of a specific group.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.