sophos_list_mobile_app_groups

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description must convey behavioral traits. It only states that the tool lists groups, implying a read-only operation, but does not explicitly confirm it is non-destructive or mention any side effects, rate limits, or required permissions. The schema covers parameters, but the description adds no behavioral context beyond the name.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that is concise and directly states the tool's purpose. It has no fluff or unnecessary words. However, it could be slightly expanded to include more context without losing conciseness, hence a 4 rather than 5.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple list tool with well-documented parameters in the schema, the description is adequate. However, it does not mention pagination, sorting, filtering behavior (though parameters imply some), or the return format (no output schema). It provides the basic purpose but could be more complete with minimal additions.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

All 5 parameters have descriptions in the input schema (100% coverage). The tool description does not add any additional meaning or context to the parameters beyond what the schema already provides. Therefore, it meets the baseline but does not exceed it.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool lists mobile app groups (managed app collections) in a Sophos Mobile tenant. The verb 'list' and resource 'mobile app groups' are specific, and it distinguishes from sibling tools that create, get, update, or delete mobile app groups.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives is provided. It does not specify prerequisites, exclusions, or context for use. While a list tool's purpose is generally clear, the description lacks explicit usage recommendations, earning a middle score.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.