sophos_unblock_addresses_bulk

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Description claims 'Remove', a destructive operation, but annotations set destructiveHint: false, which is contradictory. No additional behavioral context provided. Annotation contradiction detected.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, 12 words, no fluff. Front-loaded with key action and resource. Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers primary action and parameter usage, but lacks behavioral context due to annotation contradiction. No mention of return values or where to get IDs, though acceptable given simplicity. Could be more complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline 3. Description does not add meaning beyond schema; it merely restates that removal is by IDs, which is already in the schema description for ids parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the verb 'Remove', resource 'blocked IP address entries', and scope 'multiple by their IDs in a single call'. It distinguishes from siblings like sophos_list_blocked_addresses (list) and sophos_create_blocked_item (add).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. It implies bulk removal but does not mention prerequisites or when-not to use. Missing reference to siblings for alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.