Skip to main content
Glama
rijul170

Sophos Central MCP Server

by rijul170

sophos_dns_list_policies

Read-only

List DNS Protection policies for a tenant. Filter by name or sort results to manage DNS security settings.

Instructions

List all DNS Protection policies for a tenant.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameNoFilter by exact policy name
pageNoPage number, starting with 1
sortNoSort field (e.g. name, createdAt)
page_sizeNoResults per page
tenant_idYesTenant UUID
page_totalNoWhether to return total page count
name_containsNoFilter by name substring
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false. The description adds no behavioral details such as pagination, filtering, or sorting capabilities, which are present in the schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise with one sentence and no unnecessary words. However, it could be structured to include more useful information without sacrificing brevity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 7 parameters and no output schema, the description is too minimal. It does not mention that the tool supports pagination, sorting, or filtering, leaving the agent with insufficient context for correct usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with all parameters described. The description does not add any meaning beyond what the schema provides, so baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'List' and the resource 'DNS Protection policies' with the scope 'for a tenant'. It distinguishes from siblings like 'sophos_dns_get_policy' by implying 'all' policies.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies when to use (to list all policies for a tenant) but provides no explicit guidance on when not to use this tool or mention of alternatives like 'sophos_dns_get_policy' for a single policy.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/rijul170/sophos-central-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server