sophos_get_partner_level

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It only states 'return partner level information', indicating a read operation, but does not disclose pagination behavior (despite page/page_size parameters), rate limits, or any side effects. The schema covers parameters, but the description adds minimal behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise at two sentences and 18 words. It front-loads the core purpose and immediately mentions key filters. Every word serves a purpose with no redundancy or fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 7 parameters and no output schema, the description provides a clear purpose and mentions filters but omits pagination details (even though schema has page/page_size) and does not explain the response format. It is minimally adequate but lacks completeness for a tool with this complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline 3. The description lists the required billing sub-region and optional filters (name, update date, EDI number), reinforcing their roles. However, it adds no additional semantic detail beyond what the schema descriptions already provide, such as format hints or relationships.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool returns partner level information for a distributor's partners, using a specific verb and resource. It mentions filtering by billing sub-region and optional filters. While it distinguishes from siblings like sophos_get_partner_admin by focusing on 'partner level', it doesn't explicitly differentiate from other get tools, leaving slight ambiguity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for retrieving partner level information with required and optional filters. However, it provides no guidance on when not to use the tool, no mention of alternatives among the many sibling get tools, and no context on prerequisites (e.g., requiring a distributor ID).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.