sophos_playbook_threat_hunt

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the full burden. It indicates a read-only operation (returns playbook) with no destructive implications. However, it does not explicitly state that the operation is safe, has no side effects, or require specific permissions. Adequate but not thorough.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences efficiently convey the purpose and return value. Front-loaded with action ('Get threat hunting playbook') and then output details. No unnecessary information, but could be slightly more structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's moderate complexity (single parameter, simple output), the description adequately covers purpose, input, and output. No output schema exists, so description compensates. Lacks explicit mention of side-effect-free behavior, but overall sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% for the parameter 'hunt_hypothesis', describing it as 'Threat hunting hypothesis to investigate'. The description does not add meaning beyond the schema; it does not explain the enumerated choices or provide examples. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it retrieves a threat hunting playbook for Sophos Live Discover and XDR, and specifies outputs (SQL queries, MITRE mappings, isolation decision trees). Differentiates from sibling playbook tools like sophos_playbook_incident_response and sophos_playbook_malware_triage by focusing on threat hunting.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies use for threat hunting based on a hypothesis but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives or provide contraindications. No guidance on prerequisites or when not to use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.