sophos_get_tenant

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, so the description does not need to reiterate safety. The description adds that the response includes the regional API host, which provides some behavioral insight beyond the schema but does not disclose any new risks or side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that is immediately clear and front-loaded with the essential information. There is no superfluous content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description mentions that details include the regional API host, but does not specify what other details are contained in the response. Since no output schema exists, this omission forces the agent to infer the full structure. However, for a simple get-by-ID tool, the description is adequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the parameter description in the schema is clear. The description mentions 'by ID' and 'regional API host' which adds context about the output but does not enhance understanding of the parameter beyond what the schema provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it retrieves details for a specific managed tenant by ID, including the regional API host. It distinguishes itself from siblings like sophos_list_tenants (list all) and sophos_create_tenant (create) by focusing on a single tenant retrieval.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. For example, it could mention to use this when needing detailed information for a specific tenant vs using sophos_list_tenants to enumerate all tenants. This lack of context might lead to incorrect tool selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.