Skip to main content
Glama
rijul170

Sophos Central MCP Server

by rijul170

sophos_start_detections_query

Read-only

Start an async detections query in Sophos Central. Receive a run ID to later fetch results once the query completes.

Instructions

Start an async detections query run. Returns a run ID. Poll sophos_get_detections_query_status until status is 'finished', then retrieve results with sophos_get_detections_query_results.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
sortNoSort order for results. E.g. [{field: 'severity', direction: 'desc'}]
to_dateNoEnd of the time range in ISO 8601 format
severityNoArray of integer severity scores to filter on (1–10). E.g. [7,8,9,10] for high severity.
from_dateNoStart of the time range in ISO 8601 format (e.g. '2024-01-01T00:00:00.000Z')
tenant_idYesTenant UUID
detection_ruleNoFilter by a specific detection rule ID (e.g. 'WIN-PROT-BEHAVIORAL-MALWARE-EXEC-12B-T1059-001')
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Explains the async nature and return value. Annotations (readOnlyHint, openWorldHint, destructiveHint) are present and consistent. No contradictions. Lacks mention of side effects like rate limits, but the core behavior is transparent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences that efficiently convey purpose and workflow. No unnecessary words or repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With perfect schema coverage, clear annotations, and a simple return value (run ID) mentioned in the description, the tool is completely documented. No output schema is needed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and parameters are well-described in the schema itself. The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it starts an async detections query and returns a run ID. It distinguishes itself from siblings by specifying the next steps (poll and retrieve), which are named as separate tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly instructs to poll sophos_get_detections_query_status until finished, then retrieve results with sophos_get_detections_query_results. This provides a complete usage workflow.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/rijul170/sophos-central-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server