sophos_request_bulk_sender_privilege

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate readOnlyHint=false and destructiveHint=false, but the description does not disclose side effects (e.g., whether it creates a ticket, requires approval, or modifies mailbox settings), permissions needed, or potential failure modes.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, clear sentence with no unnecessary words. It is front-loaded but could include additional context without being overly verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description is adequate for a simple request action with 5 parameters and no output schema, but it lacks details on prerequisites, follow-up steps, or behavior after request submission, which could be important for completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, and the description adds little beyond what the schema already provides. It implicitly links count and period to high-volume sending but does not clarify purpose further than the schema's 'justification' description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool requests bulk sender privilege for a mailbox, with a specific verb 'request' and resource 'bulk sender privilege'. It distinguishes from sibling mailbox tools like sophos_get_mailbox or sophos_create_mailbox, which do not handle this privilege request.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for mailboxes needing high email volumes but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., updating mailbox settings). No exclusions or comparisons are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.