sophos_update_software_comment

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds behavioral context by stating 'full replace with PUT,' which hints at idempotency and the nature of the operation. However, it lacks details on error conditions (e.g., package not found), permissions required, or side effects, which are important given no annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence that efficiently conveys the purpose and behavior with no unnecessary words. Every part contributes essential information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple update tool with no output schema, the description adequately explains the operation and its HTTP method. It does not describe return values, but the tool's nature suggests a simple success response. The presence of sibling tools for reading comments compensates for missing output details.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, providing baseline meaning for all parameters. The description adds value by clarifying that the comment is fully replaced (PUT semantics) rather than merged, which goes beyond the schema description of 'Comment text to set.'

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (Set or update) on a specific resource (user comment for a static software package) and includes the HTTP method (PUT) to indicate full replacement. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like sophos_get_software_comment and sophos_delete_software_comment by specifying modification intent.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies when to use (to set or update a comment) but does not explicitly state when not to use or provide alternatives. However, with sibling tools like sophos_get_software_comment for reading and sophos_delete_software_comment for deletion, usage is clear from context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.