sophos_update_adaptive_attack_protection

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate the tool is not read-only and not destructive. The description adds value by clarifying the auto-disable behavior when expires_after is provided, which goes beyond the annotation structural hints.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences, concise and to the point with no extraneous information. It is front-loaded with the core action and additional behavior.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple toggle tool with optional expiry, the description captures the main behavior adequately. Missing output schema is acceptable as return values are standard. No prerequisites or permissions are mentioned, but the schema covers required parameters.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description reiterates the auto-disable behavior already documented in the expires_after parameter description, adding minimal extra semantic value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: enabling or disabling Adaptive Attack Protection (AAP) on an endpoint. It also mentions the auto-disable behavior when an expiry duration is set, which is specific and distinguishes this tool from other Sophos management tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains the auto-disable feature but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor does it provide prerequisites or exclusions. The usage context is implied but not fully detailed.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.